Review of a scientific article is one of the most important stages of work review, whether the material will be published at all depends on its success. Usually, the review process causes researchers a lot of concern, but today the “Scientific Publications” Company will talk about how to prepare a scientific article for review and what to pay attention to in order to successfully pass this difficult stage.
What is review?
Scientific article review is the process of reviewing and evaluating it at the level of a research journal by experts with significant experience in one or another field of research. The higher the scientometric indicators of the publication in which the publication is planned, the stricter the material review process. This especially includes journals indexed in the Scopus and Web of Science databases.
Who can be a reviewer of a scientific article?
Usually, the requirements for reviewers are set at the level of the respective journals. And again, the rule is that the higher the rank of the journal, the higher the demands are made to the reviewer. Usually, in the process of selecting reviewers, attention is paid to:
- Availability of scientific ranks and degrees.
- Publications number in publications indexed in Scopus and Web of Science and their scientometric indicators.
- Personal indicators of the author, for example, h-index.
- Image and competence in a certain field of research.
- Expert independence, that is, the absence of potential conflicts of interest.
Of course, it is possible to start your activity as a reviewer of a scientific journal without such significant professional achievements. You can practice on open review platforms, and later submit your application for consideration to a local publication.
Review types
To this date, in the scientific world there are disputes about the appropriateness and effectiveness of the review procedure, therefore, the process of scientific material reviewing has changed, various review procedures and their features have begun to stand out:
- Single-blind review – the reviewer knows whose work he is evaluating, but the author does not have information about the reviewer.
- Single-blind review – the expert evaluating the work and its author do not have information about each other.
- More transparent peer review –review reports are available for viewing by the entire interested community.
- Open review –the entire history of scientific material review and its changes is freely accessible.
- Collaborative review – a special review procedure that involves collaborative review by some experts, and sometimes cooperation with the authors.
- Post publication review – usually this review type means work evaluation on specialized forums. Post-publication review is more about expressing one’s opinion, as well as evaluating the primary reviewers by interested members of the scientific community
How to write a scientific publication review? What do experts pay attention to?
When preparing a scientific publication, it should be paid special attention to several points that will definitely not be ignored at the review stage:
- The work should correspond to the writing scientific style, have clearly formulated theses and be characterized by a high degree of the author’s opinion formulation.
- The author’s approach of the researcher is clearly visible.
- The work has a high degree of originality, uniqueness and novelty.
- The work results achieve the purpose that was set at the beginning of the research.
- The work is executed in accordance with the appropriate structure (IMRAD).
- The study content is clearly presented.
- The work sources are correctly selected and fully express the content of the work.
- The conclusions of the work are original and clear.
- The work is written without errors, correctly translated into professional English, without technical errors.
The main stages of a scientific article review at the journal level in Scopus and Web of Science:
If you have additional questions about the features of the review process or you need assistance with “Publication in Scopus” or “Publication in Web of Science”, please contact the “Scientific Publications” Company. Our specialists will provide high-quality support for your article at all stages, including the review stage.
New professional achievements - only with “Scientific Publications!”
We will remind you that the material “Publication in Scopus and Web of Science: all cooperation stages” was recently released